The Assassin’s Creed: Shadows Fallout Continues To Go Nuclear

 

The re-imagined Yatsuke, a former slave turned retainer returned to his slave owners under the next regime, as featured in Assassin’s Creed: Shadows, and the source of the game’s continuing controversy.

If you already know this story, yes, that article title is a pun.

I really do try to avoid the internet drama. I want to see the end product, but the creative process is also fascinating. What’s happening now as Ubisoft continues to commit the public relations version of a kamikaze run with Japan over Assassin’s Creed: Shadows is a fascinating train wreck of mistake after mistake in an effort to continue the historically inaccurate narrative that Yasuke was some great black samurai when he basically carried the weapons, less Tiger Woods and more Tiger Woods’ caddy.

As fans want to be playing ninjas in a game where ninjas are practically the inspiration for the player character in previous games, they instead get some scenes with a female ninja (rare but likely enough to not raise too many eyebrows) and a hulking (for Japan) samurai, but it’s the treatment of that “samurai” that has gotten Ubisoft in continuing trouble, and their latest blunder with a little statuette and recent response to the Tokyo Game Show…by avoiding it…is doing a lot of eyebrow raising.

Some of you may call this choice controversial, if not for sociopolitical reasons then for his cursing, but Az of the YouTube channel HeelvsBabyface has a really good compilation of every mistake that has come along in this game and in other recent Ubisoft releases, except he missed one (see, that’s an IGN link: political affiliations be damned around here–I look at stories) involving the appropriation of fan-created flags treated as real life historical feudal era Japan flags for an art book. In other words, whether we’re talking the game itself or the promotional and licensed material Ubisoft can’t help but fail at this project time and again. Az has the rest of it, though.

Continue reading

“Yesterday’s” Comic> Sonic The Hedgehog #72

“Great, reruns.”

Sonic The Hedgehog #72

Archie Comics Publications (July, 1999)

LETTERER: Jeff Powell

EDITOR: J.F. Gabrie

“I, Robotnik!”

WRITER: Karl Bollers

PENCILER: Steven Butler

INKER: Pam Eklund

COLORIST: Frank Gagliardo

Tales Of The Great War: “The Shot Heard Round The World”

WRITER: Ken Penders

PENICLER: Art Mawhinney

INKER: Jim Amash

COLORIST: Barry Grossman

Continue reading

BW’s Daily Video> Legacy Characters Who Failed (On Purpose!)

Catch more from Major Disaster on YouTube

 

Star Trek: Pitch And Guide> The New Story Bible Review Set

I’ve been wanting to do another story bible/writer’s guide deep dive review since I finished Beast Machines: Transformers. In the past I’ve also covered Star Trek: The Next Generation, Batman: The Animated Series, and the sales pitch for the original  ThunderCats. It’s interesting to see what concepts made it to the final product, but I hadn’t figured out what to do next.

During my hiatus week I decided to do a Google search for story bibles and see what came up. I came across three different websites that collected a few as part of an instructional series on how to write a story bible, the guide by which writers were told how to write the show, the lore, the personalities, and everything else a writer is supposed to do and now thanks to writers and showrunners who really don’t care about what they’re working on no longer do well. This one had a few potential offerings, though given the shows I watch I can hardly judge Ben And Burman as I just learned they exist when I came upon this page. Still, there’s some fodder for the future.

One of the items on the page was for both the pitch and writer’s guide for the original Star Trek as well as the other pre-Bad Robot disasters. I’ve already done The Next Generation, and while I wish I could have done the first show first, being first and all, I still have a great opportunity I’m not passing up. So let’s prep ourselves for the next one in this series of articles.

Continue reading

“Yesterday’s” Comic> Blue Beetle #1 (Charlton: Ted Kord)

Resuming the tradition of a Blue Beetle not having his own comic to himself.

Blue Beetle #1

Charlton Comics Group (June, 1967)

The Blue Beetle: “Bugs The Squids”

WRITER: D.C. Glanzman

ARTIST: Steve Ditko

LETTERER: A Machine (In the 1960s? Someone worked that machine. AI lettering isn’t even in use now.)

The Question:

No title, but also no credits. The same A. Machine seems to be used for the lettering and Ditko is known to have worked on this story, so I’m guessing it’s the same credits even if I’m really guessing on the writer.

[Read along with me here]

Continue reading

BW’s Daily Video> Does Disney Own Live-Action TV Batman?

Catch more from Comic Drake on YouTube

It’s as good a theory as any other. Superman doesn’t have the same embargos as Batman shows, even animated Batman at various points, so Batman rights on TV has been a mess for a long time. By the way, he corrects in the comments that Disney bought ABC (or at least parent company at the time Capital Cities) in 1996. I think he just was stuck on 1966 for too long. 😀

Chapter By Chapter> Tom Clancy’s Op-Center: Mirror Image chapter 6

Chapter by Chapter features me reading one chapter (or possibly multiple chapter for this one) of the selected book at the time and reviewing it as if I were reviewing an episode of a TV show or an issue of a comic. There will be spoilers if you haven’t read to the point I have, and if you’ve read further I ask that you don’t spoil anything further into the book. Think of it as read-along book club.

So we took a week off, and it’s not like we ended on a major cliffhanger in the previous two chapters. The shorter one ended with our James Bond wanna-be sliding a fake coin under the door that’s really an eavesdropping device. That’s where we’re coming in. This chapter is short, but just long enough to make the minimum page count, which given my time is fine with me.

Despite my grumblings thus far I am trying to go into this with an open mind. While our recurring characters are already showing to be the same putzes from last time, the timing of this as the second novel is off, and the same chapter breaking issues remain, though now with numbers for marking the in the headline, It’s still too early to tell if the writer learned any lessons from the previous book. The chapter thing is only an improvement when it comes to this review format. The rest of the issues I had from the first novel were the cast issues, with the recurring ones not people I’m interested in and the one-shots far more interesting, and that was how they tried to sell the franchise to readers. Apparently enough people liked it that this is only the second book in the series and not the last one.

So what did they see in it? Let’s crack open the book for this week’s chapter and find out.

Sunday, 12:50 PM, St. Petersburg

Continue reading