BW’s Daily Video> Why Batman Can’t Just Give His Money Away

Catch more from Literature Devil on YouTube

By the way, Bruce does give money to charities, gives people jobs–including ex-cons to keep them out of “having” to return to being criminals and henchmen, and raising funds for the rare honest politician or police in Gotham City. VERY rare. Money doesn’t solve everything.

[VIDEO] WTF Is Up With YouTube (A Quick History)

A little bit of fun trivia for this filler from the buffer.

YouTube has become a big player in the streaming game, currently combining big name stuff with user created works, though at times it feels like YouTube’s owner, Google, is less interested in supporting the latter and pursuing Hollywood. Corporatism at work, thinking the big names bring in the most moolah? Possibly, but smaller creators are feeling more and more frustrated at changes to the platform’s Partner Program rules that tighten the numbers needed to join, questionable AI bots flagging things, false flags to get money or attack people they don’t like, and some serious hits to animation channels along those lines as well as potential newcomers. This makes little sense given how YouTube creators are being chased for livestreaming channels, Tubi has an outlet for those same creators, and then there’s three theatrical movies by YouTubers (and in one case adapting his own work) that did well in theaters this year.

I thought that’s what this video from Fact Quickie was going to go over, but seeing as they’re a kind of documentary channel I’m not surprised it isn’t. Usually this channel has videos that fit the Daily Video length, but this is more like a not so quickie, though still too short for Saturday Night Showcase as a trivia video. Host Simon Whistler goes over the history of YouTube, starting as a video dating channel and almost immediately pivoting to the site where you post pictures of your dog. Now it’s a home for original content as video making software has made major technological leaps. He doesn’t go over that part so much, focusing on the history of the channel itself, what video is actually the first ever YouTube video, and how PayPal played a part in the site’s formation.

Continue reading →

BW’s Daily Video> Why We Need Heroes

Catch more from SUPER FRAME on YouTube

 

Star Wars: Stop Calling The Planned Trilogy A “Skywalker Trilogy”

Word out on the internet is that, despite the flop of the first Star Wars movie in years, they haven’t given up.

The Mandalorian & Grogu may not be the best example of a Star Wars movie, given that it was a planned season for a series that destroyed it’s own success for the marketing gods and politics both real world and behind the scenes office ego crap. Now we’re hearing that DisneyFilm wants to do another “Skywalker trilogy”, with the director for the Spider-Man films, John Watts, taking the lead. Simon Kinberg is signed up as the screenwriter. While Watts understood Peter Parker as a character (not so much his world, but Sony has to take a lot of blame for that in the deal they made with Marvel Studios), Kinberg did the opposite with the X-Men according to people who care about the X-Men. (Not me, or I’d have more to say on the Wolverine game–and rather negative given the playthroughs and discussions I’ve watched–plus I hate Wolverine.) So the question is who will be the cancelling force. You might just end up with a mid movie. Again.

While Bleeding Fool‘s Katrina Smith pointed out why a new Skywalker Trilogy won’t work in the current climate, where fans have pretty much been ready to give up on any new Star Wars in favor of the first two trilogies as well as the comics, games, and novels that came out during the “wilderness years” between and after trilogies, I think she missed one important detail. Based on the real and reel worlds’ events you can’t make another Skywalker Trilogy. The way things are setup now, you can make Star Wars, but how do you do a Skywalker trilogy or anything in the greater Skywalker Saga…when there aren’t any Skywalkers anymore?

Continue reading →

BW’s Daily Video> Star Trek III Got The Villain Wrong

Catch more from Playback Pending on YouTube

 

 

Chapter By Chapter> Star Trek: The IDIC Epidemic chapter 15

Chapter By Chapter (usually) features me reading one chapter of the selected book at a time and reviewing it as if I were reviewing an episode of a TV show or an issue of a comic. There will be spoilers if you haven’t read to the point I have, and if you’ve read further I ask that you don’t spoil anything further into the book. Think of it as a read-along book club.

Because we apparently can’t have enough trouble, last chapter two of our book heroes are in big trouble. This chapter, however, it’s back to the Enterprise to see what’s happening with the main party.

I was in maybe middle school when I first read this book. Nowadays I have a stronger concept of storytelling, which I’m sure doing reviews for a couple decades plays a part in. So I’m noticing all of these disasters and potential disasters going on. Without spoiling too much on the homepage, we have so far…

  • The main plot of a viral plague
  • Sendet finding a new woman to hone in on
  • his almost cultish group running around the ship
  • damage to the water turbines and nobody healthy enough to help fix it
  • our heroes trapped in the mountains
  • the potential social disorder coming from all of that save the poor saps in the mountains

I’m a little more wery about too many subplots in a story. I’d probably be less interested in soap operas now than I was as a kid. Back then I enjoyed the book enough to track down the previous book despite not needing it to follow anything here. I am still enjoying the book, but we aren’t quite halfway through it yet. I’ve just seen too many subplots at one time going wrong and taking away from the main issue, the plague in this case. As we head into the next chapter my concerns and memories are trying to balance each other. Let’s see what wins out.

Continue reading →

BW’s Daily Video> Avengers: Endgame Doesn’t Hold Up

Catch more from JesterBell on YouTube

Somebody in the comments of my recent Avengers article (it was long enough ago that I couldn’t find it) brought up that Endgame was technically during Disney’s ownership. Fair point, but it was wrapping up the previous period and still followed the rules of pre-Disney Marvel. I can’t disagree with any of JesterBell’s observations. There were some serious flaws, like conflicting time travel rules. I would like to rewatch it and see if I follow her in changing opinions on it.