
While the Motion Picture Association Of America was ready to greet Netflix’s movie studio productions into their community at this year’s CinemaCon, many in Hollywood are not. Steven Spielberg compared it to TV movies (which by the way some have been released in theaters first over the years as far back as the 1970s, inspired movies even if they’re usually not-stalgia or mockstalgia these days, as well as TV shows inspired by movies) while actress Helen Mirren slammed them hard, insisting that the theatrical experience is somehow damaged because Netflix only keeps their movies in theaters a short time compared to other studios before putting them on their service.
Here’s a question I have: where were these two when the movie theater was putting drive-in theaters out of business and killing that experience? To me this is more Hollywood elitist snobbery. For most people the theater experience has been damaged by rude people on their cellphones or acting like they’re making the Rifftrax, high prices for tickets and snacks when they’re already struggling to make ends meet and have a limited entertainment budget if one at all, and really long movies that people have to miss part of to use the restroom. (That happens to me often.) I love the movie theater and wish I could go more often, but I do understand those who would rather sit at home on their widescreen TVs with a DVD or Blu-Ray library they can go into at any moment over and over for a one-time cost, or a streaming service for the price of a movie they can only see once and one of. Someone in the comments of that second link also noted that theaters are not fun for people who don’t live near one or suffer from hearing loss (if not full-on deafness) and can’t find a theater with captions or get their wheelchairs into a seat. The theatrical experience isn’t the same for them as it is for Spielberg and Mirren, who may have their own theaters at home (especially Spielberg) or at least access to one that is in better shape and with a crowd who caters to their way of thinking. They want to protect that old status symbol of theatrical movies (as long as they aren’t animated) but the general public is tired of it.
Maybe the theaters will become like the drive-ins, a niche experience continued by those who remember the glory days and want to relive them or check them out but otherwise get their entertainment elsewhere. It’s not as easy to go out these days as it used to be when people are struggling to feed their families. The entertainment budget is smaller than it is for the Hollywood elitists who seem more worried about losing their status symbol experience rather than entertain.
Tell others about the Spotlight:
Another “Zack Snyder Doesn’t Get Batman” Post
Counting the Bat FAMILY, he on like three different teams right now.
Not understanding Batman is becoming a trend. It didn’t start with Zack Snyder, but he’s sure trying to rival Tom King in mastering it.
At a recent event Snyder showed off three of his movies, including Batman Versus Superman: Dawn Of Justice as well as Watchmen, Snyder was asked about Batman’s no-kill policy versus the machine guns he’s breaking out in that movie. He basically said, and the video below will go more into it, that Batman would totally kill people in the real world and if you don’t think so you’re living in a “fantasy world”. And considering this is still around Batman’s 80th anniversary (a coincidence I’m sure) I guess we have to give one article to discussing what people don’t understand about Batman.
Ignoring the fact that a work of fiction IS a fantasy world, since somehow the man who made Sucker Punch doesn’t seem to know the difference, it’s a statement that says more about Snyder’ view of the world than it does Batman. Ewan Paterson of WhatCulture breaks down most of what Snyder got wrong. I will throw a few things in myself.
Continue reading →
Tell others about the Spotlight:
Posted by ShadowWing Tronix on April 3, 2019 in DC Spotlight and tagged Batman, commentary, Zack Snyder.
3 Comments