
Recent events have helped me choose my next look at my problems with Simon Furman’s approach to Transformers. Mairghread Scott, who you may recall has gotten the most praise from me above any of the other IDW Transformers writers (one-time appearances aside), will be hitting the mainstream IDW G1 Universe with Windblade, which will not only introduce another new character, ala Drift, but will attempt to bring female Transformers into this new continuity without…well, I’ll get to that.
Now some comment was made and Furman took offense and supposedly it’s all worked out. I won’t dwell on it too much. I don’t think Simon Furman necessarily hates women, but he does seem to have an issue with female Transformers–and frankly he isn’t the only one. Budiansky never used them during his run and even confirmed in one story that Cybertronians understand the concept of genders but don’t have them themselves. The toyline never had a female Transformer, despite their introduction in the cartoon, until Japan’s “Masterforce” line as far as I’m aware. Many fans hate the fact that they’re there to begin with. And yet others have embraced the idea, some even going so far as creating Transformers erotica and I wish to Primus I wasn’t dead serious.
However, while I probably wouldn’t have cared had they not been introduced, they have been and can’t be ignored. I want to use this opportunity to, rather than just bash Furman’s use of Arcee (although I totally will) to defend the female Transformer idea and having no clue what will happen in Windblade try to figure out why they exist and how they could be used to enhance the story rather than be used like virtually every other female character in action-style comics.
Continue reading →
Tell others about the Spotlight: